5-star rated across all three California offices.
Real outcomes from real patients. Aggregated from Google Business Profile reviews across Riverbank, Fair Oaks, and Elk Grove.
Hear from patients across all three locations.
"$1,999 was unbeatable. Other places quoted me $4,000+. Dr. Sunny was upfront about everything from the first photo I sent. No surprise charges, no hidden fees, exactly what they said."
"I'd been hiding my smile for years. Dr. Sunny did my full upper arch and I walked out with permanent teeth that day. Best decision I've made in a decade."
"I was nervous because the price seemed too good. But the team explained every step, the 3D scan was free, and the final crown looks better than my real teeth. Five stars all the way."
What review patterns to look for — and what to ignore — when comparing implant providers across Sacramento, Stockton, Modesto, and the broader California market.
Why patient reviews of single-tooth implants under-represent long-term outcomes
The vast majority of dental implant reviews — across Google Business Profile, Yelp, and Healthgrades — are written within the first 60 days of the surgical experience: post-consult enthusiasm, surgical-day comfort, and the relief of completing a procedure that many patients postponed for years out of cost concern. These early reviews are valuable signals about communication quality, surgical-day pain management, and front-desk experience, but they intrinsically cannot speak to the 5-, 10-, and 20-year outcomes that actually determine implant success. The clinical question that matters most — does this implant remain osseointegrated, free of peri-implantitis, and functionally stable a decade later? — is rarely captured in patient reviews. For Sacramento-region patients evaluating multiple providers, the more meaningful long-term signal is the surgeon's documented case volume, the credentialing (ADIA Diplomate, AAID Fellow, or board certification), and the published 5-year and 10-year survival rates of the specific implant brand being placed.
Red flags in dental implant reviews that often go unnoticed
Several review patterns warrant additional scrutiny when comparing implant providers across the Sacramento and Central Valley markets. (1) Reviews mentioning 'I was quoted X, but at surgery they said I actually needed Y additional procedures totaling $Z': suggests the practice's consult pricing does not survive contact with the surgical day, which is the most common pricing complaint across the U.S. implant market. (2) Reviews mentioning unfamiliar implant brands: name-brand implants (Neodent, Straumann, Nobel Biocare) have extensive long-term data and 20+ years of parts availability; less-common brands may produce identical short-term results but complicate any future restoration or repair. (3) Reviews mentioning 'the dentist who consulted with me was different from the one who did my surgery': not necessarily a problem, but worth verifying who actually places your implant and what their case volume is. (4) Reviews mentioning 'I had to wait months for my final crown after they said it would be ready in weeks': suggests lab-coordination issues that often correlate with prosthodontic-quality issues at the final delivery.
What credible long-term outcomes look like for the All-on-4 and zygomatic protocols
For full-arch implant treatment, the peer-reviewed evidence base is substantial. The original Maló All-on-4 5-year prospective cohort (Maló et al., 2003) reported 98.2% implant survival across 245 mandibular cases. Subsequent 10-year follow-up studies have consistently shown survival in the 94–96% range for mandibular All-on-4 and 92–95% for maxillary. The most common failure mode is peri-implantitis (peri-implant inflammation analogous to periodontal disease) rather than mechanical implant fracture, with risk factors including poorly-controlled diabetes, untreated bruxism, and inadequate post-surgical oral hygiene. For zygomatic implants, the published long-term cumulative survival exceeds 96% at 10 years across multiple cohort studies — among the highest of any implant procedure when performed by surgeons with documented case volume. Dr. Sunny Badyal's documented case experience spans 20,000+ implants and 700+ All-on-X cases including immediate-load and zygomatic protocols.
Send a photo. Hear from Dr. Sunny in 24 hours.
No pressure, no high-pressure sales call. Just a written treatment plan and a short video from the surgeon — so you can decide if implants are right for you on your own time.